Unforeseen crises
The 2008 financial crisis and Covid in 2020 opened up deficits no forecast had anticipated.
Question 4
Since 1998, every government has sent Brussels a path for its public finances. 18 of the 27 paths we compiled promised to bring the deficit back under 3% of GDP by a given date. Of those whose deadline has passed, 5 out of 12 were met.
Promises and reality
The solid line is the actual deficit. Each dotted line starts in the year a programme was presented and shows the promised path. 27 of 27 paths planned a falling deficit.
Promises are judged on the figure first published, the following spring: that is what France was assessed on at the time. The accounts have been revised since, sometimes markedly: for 2017, the deficit published in 2018 was 2.6%; today it stands at 3.4%.
Why the gaps?
The 2008 financial crisis and Covid in 2020 opened up deficits no forecast had anticipated.
A deficit forecast rests on a growth forecast: when the economy grows more slowly than expected, revenue follows, and the deficit slips.
From one programme to the next, the date for getting back under 3% was pushed back 6 times. The deficit has only been under 3% in these years: 1998–2001, 2005–2007, 2017–2019.
The European Union has placed France under an “excessive deficit procedure” 3 times (2003–2007, 2009–2018, since 2024).
Forecasts read by hand from the stability programmes, then from the 2024 medium-term fiscal-structural plan and its progress reports. From 1998 to 2008 the programmes gave two growth scenarios: we use the cautious one, which the government used as its reference. For the 1998 and 2000 programmes, some years come from European Commission recommendations. Programmes giving a single year (April 2020, April 2026) are listed but not drawn.